Sunday, May 27, 2012

007 SKYFALL - James Bond Musings and Teaser Trailer Thoughts


I’ve been a massive James Bond fan since I was ten years old. It was at this ripe young age that I saw my first Bond flick – 1997's Tomorrow Never Dies. I went to see it with my older cousins, my uncle, and my grandpa. I felt like one of the big kids and the movie only helped cement that notion. Seeing a Bond film is like an obligatory rite of passage into manhood and it was a trial I was more than happy to partake in. The unique adrenaline rush of gadgets, shootouts, and babes that only 007 can provide was something I’d never experienced before. I was beyond sold and my affection for the character only grew over the years as I discovered the brilliance of Sean Connery’s character-defining performance, the goofiness of Roger Moore’s mixed-quality entries, as well as the brief, but effective outings of George Lazenby (The awkward, nerdy Bond) and Timothy Dalton (The underrated, straight-faced Bond). Pierce Brosnan may have ended up with the short end of the stick with some overwhelmingly weak entries (With the exception of his spectacular debut GoldenEye), but he perfectly captured the spirit of Bond, combining the best bits of each of the previous carnations and combining it with his own unique charm. Brosnan’s performance played as a bit of a ‘Best of Bond’  but that’s not damning him with faint praise. He was spectacular in the role and, unfortunately, outshone by the awfulness of the particular entries he starred in, flicks like his final, pathetic adventure Die Another Day - A movie so ridiculously packed to the brim with terrible CG and the poor acting chops of Halle Berry, that the prospect of another Bond film seemed more painful than welcome. When invisible cars outrunning giant sun lasers on a frozen lake come into play, it's probably best to throw in the towel and start fresh and that’s exactly how Bond’s producers felt. They knew they had to get back to the gritty, grounded roots of everyone’s favorite super spy. Enter Daniel Craig and Casino Royale.

With director Martin Campbell at the helm (No stranger to Bond with GoldenEye firmly under his belt), Casino Royale was exactly what the Bond franchise needed. It felt like the first entry of the series to truly understand what makes Bond tick. It was a bit grittier and a bit darker, yes, but that classic Bond charm was still there and the action sequences were more thrilling than they had been in years. Perhaps most importantly of all – And why do I even say perhaps? Of course this is why this new incarnation was so successful – Casino Royale made Bond feel real and human in a way that the series had never seen previously. For the first time, Bond wasn’t simply an impervious hero, dashing and dodging through every car chase and shootout and bedding every possible babe, emerging completely unscathed with every hair perfectly in place. He was a man of flesh and blood in way over his head, capable of error and even getting his heart broken. Suddenly, not only did we feel thrilled by the proceedings unfolding on the screen, but we actually cared about their outcome due to our affection for the characters involved, which is something I would never have imagined from James Bond. This is due, in no small part, to an absolutely stunning performance from Daniel Craig. The only Bond he can really be compared to is Connery’s – Coldly calculating as a killer and yet charming and suave as only Agent 007 can be. He was easily the best Bond since Connery and, with the aid of a spectacular script behind him, he and director Campbell elevated Bond to a whole new level of high-quality entertainment.

Then came Quantum of Solace – 2008’s much-anticipated follow-up. Highly disappointing in the wake of Casino Royale’s utter brilliance, the 22nd Bond entry, directed by indie-fare helmer Marc Forster, was nothing more than a superfluous epilogue that served no other purpose than to…well, honestly, I’m not quite sure what purpose it served. Forster clearly lacked the chops to make a competent action film and the result was a jarbled, choppy mess with action sequences so choppy and poorly shot/edited that the effect of watching them was not too dissimilar from staring straight into a strobe light turned up to full blast. His apparent lack of interest in the character/legacy of Bond didn’t help much either and, as a result, Quantum felt like a huge step backwards for the character and the quality of the series. It wasn't that it was necessarily the worst Bond film (That credit goes to the rather dreadful A View to a Kill), but it just felt terribly 'blah' and indifferent with not a single moment standing out that would qualify it as a Bond picture.

Enter the seemingly endless legal battles, which threatened to put a final nail in the coffin of Mr. Bond for good. MGM’s looming bankruptcy seemed to make it almost certain that we might not see another Bond flick for a very long time and, even more disappointingly, that Craig might not get another chance to recapture the brilliance of his first entry. But, thank the maker, the darkness has passed and James Bond’s 23rd cinematic adventure Skyfall is set for release on November 9. During the turmoil of the MGM fiasco, many rumors were being tossed about the mill regarding who would be helming the latest picture, the most exciting of which was that Sam Mendes, the brilliant man behind American Beauty, Road to Perdition, and, more recently, Revolutionary Road, had been circling the project and having discussions with Craig about possible directions the character should take. Once Skyfall officially began moving forward with production, it seemed inevitable that Mendes would be attached to direct and, thankfully, this was exactly the case. With all that time off after Quantum, there was plenty of time to brainstorm and plan for the long-awaited follow-up to ensure that the same mistakes were not repeated.

The news kept getting better and better from there. Ralph Fiennes and Javier Bardem were attached to the project and, perhaps the most spectacular news of all was the announcement that Roger Deakins would be serving as the film’s Director of Photography. Deakins, a veteran DP for the majority of the Coen Brothers’ best films, is arguably the greatest working cinematographer of this day and age. His inclusion in Mendes’ crew only ensures that Skyfall will easily be the most impeccably shot film of the whole series. And now that the first trailer has finally arrived after months and months of teasing production stills, it’s clear that this is exactly the case. Skyfall looks badass in every conceivable way and their are shots here that will take your breath away. The Hong Kong footage is particularly jaw-dropping. The imagery is so stunning that, during my initial run-through of the trailer, I was so overwhelmed by what I was seeing that I immediately needed to re-watch it order to get a better idea of the trailer's actual content and any hints as to what the plot of the film was. Naturally, the teaser is as mysterious as the film’s title. It shows just enough to be satisfying, while still not revealing anything about what the film is actually about. It’s exactly what a teaser trailer should be and it is just plain fantastic.

With all the talk of introducing classic characters such as Q and Moneypenny to the proceedings in addition to Craig’s mentioning that they are reinjecting a sense of fun into the series that was sorely missing in the last outing, Skyfall looks to be shaping up as what could very well be the Goldfinger of the ‘new’ Bond series. I, for one, couldn’t be happier and November 9 can’t possibly get here soon enough.

Watch the trailer below and feel free to comment!!!!...you know, if you want and stuff.



2 comments:

  1. This Blog is DUMB!!!!! I know blogs, Iz a blog ASS!
    AHHHHHHH

    Please kiss me.

    ReplyDelete